Wednesday, June 29, 2011

dakota fanning push hot

    images Dakota Fanning (Emily) in Hide dakota fanning push hot. Dakota Fanning as Ro
  • Dakota Fanning as Ro



  • rkay
    05-23 02:29 PM
    I am not jealous of computer workers, I pity their life, their overall ignorance about things around and their unwarrented arrogance.

    Yes you suffer from inferiority complex !





    wallpaper Dakota Fanning as Ro dakota fanning push hot. Dakota Fanning Marie Claire
  • Dakota Fanning Marie Claire



  • natrajs
    07-07 09:54 PM
    Today I have received my GC approval email. Dependants approval is awaited. I am in this country from Jan 2001. Good luck to all.

    No LUD till final approval. Last LUD on I-485 on August 2007 on finger print day. Last week I did call Nebraska by POJ method and speak with IO. She told me my file is off the shelf and in line for adjudication. I think EAD filing on June last week did the trick. (file taken from the USCIS's never ending shelf).

    Congrats & Best Wishes

    Finally the good news





    dakota fanning push hot. Dakota Fanning Lands Modeling
  • Dakota Fanning Lands Modeling



  • chanduv23
    08-05 11:00 PM
    Please join us for a tri state lunch meet. We would like to start working on volunteers/ mobilizing members for the DC rally. Even if you cannot take the day off and come to DC please come by for the lunch. We could really use help with banners/posters/ and ideas to make this a success.

    WHEN: Saturday AUGUST 11th
    LOCATION- 148 E 48TH St, New York, NY 10017 (between Lexington and Third Avenues.)

    TIME: 1:30 pm

    ALSO- PLEASE DO UPDATE YOUR CONTACT INFORMATION

    Thank you!

    NJ members please join the tri state chapter by clicking on the link in my signature (NY chapter is now tri state chapter)





    2011 Dakota Fanning Marie Claire dakota fanning push hot. Dakota Fanning, voiceover cast
  • Dakota Fanning, voiceover cast



  • Jbpvisa
    07-12 11:01 PM
    http://www.murthy.com/chertoff_murthy.html

    July 12, 2007

    VIA FEDERAL EXPRESS
    Michael Chertoff, Esq.
    Secretary
    Department of Homeland Security


    RE: USCIS Decision to Reject I-485 Filings

    Dear Mr. Chertoff:

    It was a pleasure and an honor to meet with you and to share my views during your panel discussion at the Harvard Worldwide Congress June 15, 2007 in Washington, D.C. I understand and appreciate that the responsibility vested in you as the Secretary of the U.S. Department of Homeland Security is no simple task. We applaud your service to our nation. After meeting with you personally and speaking with you, I am more convinced than ever that you will do the right thing for our country and for the people you serve, both in terms of securing our nation and in being the leader of the DHS, with over 20 federal agencies reporting to you, including the USCIS.

    Purpose of this Letter

    I am writing to you at this time to address recent actions by the USCIS to refuse to accept I-485 adjustment of status filing during July 2007 that are having significant impact upon the reliability of the legal immigration system in this country, as well as impacting legal foreign nationals and the many U.S. businesses that rely upon the work they perform.

    USCIS Decision Contradicts its Long Standing Procedure

    In contradiction of its own long standing policy and procedure, we understand that the USCIS, through its Director Gonzalez, contacted the U.S. Department of State (DOS) and requested or required the DOS to issue a �revised� Visa Bulletin on July 2, 2007. The USCIS then used the revised Bulletin to refuse to accept I-485 filings. This decision deprives thousands of foreign nationals, and their families, of the rights and privileges that are attendant to the I-485 filing.

    These Highly Skilled Professionals Followed All the Rules and Believe in the American Dream

    These professionals and their employers have played by our established immigration laws and rules. The vast majority of these thousands of potential applicants has a U.S. employer corporation, university or other business as a sponsor for permanent resident status. The exceptions from an employer are for those who are considered of �extraordinary ability� or whose work is in our �national interest.� Many of these applicants have completed their Bachelor�s, Master�s and/or PhD programs from U.S. universities. They believe in the opportunities of this great nation and strive to achieve the American Dream by following all the rules, working hard, paying taxes, and striving to do the right thing. They believe in this country, and rely upon our systems, our government, and our processes. Unfortunately, on July 2, 2007, we let them down. The USCIS abandoned its own system and long standing practices. This happened through manipulation of the use of visa numbers, insisting upon the issuance of a "revised visa bulletin," and instituting the USCIS policy of rejecting every employment-based I-485 that could have been filed during the month of July 2007.

    USCIS Decision Denies Substantive and Procedural Rights to Highly Skilled Workers and Their Employers - Many of Whom Have Already Suffered and Will Suffer Further Harm/ Injury

    Not only does the USCIS' action harm the individuals and employers involved, it undermines the reliability of our entire employment-based immigration system. The unexpected decision of the USCIS to refuse to accept any I-485 filings denies both substantive and procedural due process rights to would be applicants across the U.S. All of these applicants are employment based (EB) applicants who are primarily highly skilled professionals or experienced workers, that the U.S. seeks in high demand areas, including: science, technology, medicine, research, business, academia, and education.

    The harm in not accepting the filings in July 2007 goes beyond mere delay. In reliance upon the July Visa Bulletin, starting in mid-June 2007, these applicants took the steps necessary to prepare their filings and made decisions in reliance upon the USCIS accepting their filings during July 2007. In order to be present in the U.S., as required for these filings, many applicants and their families canceled travel plans abroad or arranged to return to the U.S. on short notice missing family weddings and other important life events. They undertook medical examinations and paid for the required tests which must accompany the I-485 filings. (The USCIS had refused to waive this requirement even temporarily.) They hired lawyers to process their paperwork; they arranged to obtain documents from abroad on an expedited basis, involving foreign lawyers and foreign governments, all at a significant cost. They made employment and other strategic immigration related decisions to be able to process their I-485s for them and their families. Some canceled visa appointments at the consulates, or withdrew other immigration filings, all in reliance upon the USCIS accepting I-485 filings during July 2007.

    The applicants and their employers lose the rights and privileges that accompany the filing of the I-485. These include eligibility for the Employment Authorization Document (EAD) and Advanced Parole (AP), thus eliminating the need for the individuals and their employers to make the filings necessary to maintain a non-immigrant, temporary status. These same ancillary benefits also apply to dependant family members. Most importantly, those that have not filed I-485s are not eligible for "portability" benefits under the �American Competitiveness in the Twenty First Century Act� of Oct. 2000 or �AC21� as it is sometimes referred to. This ineligibility for AC21 portability forces career stagnation. This is to the detriment of the individual as well as their sponsoring employer. Under AC21 portability, employers can promote and/or relocate employees to positions that are the same or similar job classifications as the positions for which they were initially sponsored. Individuals can utilize these provisions for career advancement, and for entrepreneurship. Given that the green card process often spans many years, AC21 portability allows the necessary flexibility to permit the case to continue, to accommodate changes in the sponsoring employer's needs as well as opportunities that are specific to the beneficiary.

    The list of stories of individuals and families harmed by the USCIS decision is endless. We have for example, many spouses who will now be separated potentially for years on end, as one received a green card during the USCIS' June "rush," while the other is now ineligible to file.

    The USCIS decision also created a burden on U.S. employers. Further delays in the green card process mean that, at best, U.S. employers have to continue to file temporary petitions to keep their workforce in the U.S. legally; at worst, it jeopardizes the availability of this needed highly educated and skilled workforce.

    USCIS Motive is to Collect Millions of Additional Filing Fees

    Many are baffled by the USCIS decision to reject I-485 filings in July, and its use of the �revised� Visa Bulletin as an excuse. The suspected motive is the collection of the substantially higher filing fees that will be generated after July 27, 2007. This entire incident sends the wrong message about our government, our policies and our legal system reeking of greed and inconsistency. Even the appearance of such impropriety undermines our system.

    .................
    continue



    more...


    dakota fanning push hot. Actress Dakota Fanning arrives at the premiere of amp;quot;Charlotteamp;acute;s
  • Actress Dakota Fanning arrives at the premiere of amp;quot;Charlotteamp;acute;s



  • pmb76
    07-14 12:14 AM
    I think the typo is INTENTIONAL and was meant to get your attention to this thread. I thought it was some congressman/congresswoman with last name Murphy who wrote to Chertoff. Otherwise I wouldn't come and comment on this news. Do you think Chertoff cares about Murthy's letter ?





    dakota fanning push hot. Dakota Fanning - cast in New
  • Dakota Fanning - cast in New



  • greencard_fever
    07-28 03:55 PM
    yawn...
    rolls over to the other side of bed...
    yawn again...
    turns over pillow to the cooler side...
    yawn again..
    dreams of this thread getting closed because it is absolutely worthless ... crap .. twas just a dream :D

    Yawn...
    Please close this thread..
    Big Yawn..



    more...


    dakota fanning push hot. Dakota Fanning was born with
  • Dakota Fanning was born with



  • gimmeacard
    07-12 05:57 PM
    my PD is april 2006, hope it comes soon





    2010 Dakota Fanning Lands Modeling dakota fanning push hot. Dakota Fanning (Emily) in Hide
  • Dakota Fanning (Emily) in Hide



  • Legal_In_A_Limbo
    03-14 05:11 PM
    Guys -

    I got the Ac21 employment letter from my new employer and they have filed my H1B transfer and I have the following questions:

    a. Background check: They are currently doing my background check. How long does it take to complete this process? Even though I do not have any bad history still a little nervous. Is there anything I need to know about this?

    b. H1b Transfer receipt: My receipt reached yesterday morning at 10:30 am. Please let me know how long does it take to get the receipt back. This is important for me to take my new job.

    Thanks
    Sathyaraj

    We sent a letter to USCIS to revoke the existing G-28.
    We just sent a letter and 485 receipt for me and my husband.

    Just wanted to let u know.



    more...


    dakota fanning push hot. Dakota Fanning established
  • Dakota Fanning established



  • BharatPremi
    03-17 03:18 PM
    But when that happens, I guess, guys in CP wil get their interview scheduled (as long as their PD is current; no RD date concept there) as the queue in CP is not as long. Correct?

    In general CP ones get out of this mess first always... I know you are CP one and you would be out well before the guy having same PD but stuck in AOS.





    hair Dakota Fanning, voiceover cast dakota fanning push hot. Dakota Fanning Marie Claire
  • Dakota Fanning Marie Claire



  • xyz2005
    07-18 10:37 AM
    Its getting dicey here

    My attorney says so far I have not received your rejection but not to say USCIS might have mailed one and we have not received it. If we get it then we will resubmit..if not then you will get receipt notice.

    He did not address whether we will be able to retain our July 2nd queue number or not.

    We all should be worried now.! Don't know what to say or recommend.



    more...


    dakota fanning push hot. Dakota Fanning at the 2008
  • Dakota Fanning at the 2008



  • Legal_In_A_Limbo
    03-14 05:51 PM
    Thanks for sharing the info. Did you get any new attorney?

    I self filed, as will be doing AC-21 in a month or so.
    So wanted to make sure i revoke my company attorney.

    Thanks





    hot Actress Dakota Fanning arrives at the premiere of amp;quot;Charlotteamp;acute;s dakota fanning push hot. Dakota Fanning has signed
  • Dakota Fanning has signed



  • BPforGC
    03-10 04:16 PM
    Until Economy is back on track and unemployment rate is back to below 5%, do not attempt anything that pisses of American public. It is not the public perse, but those anti-immigration idiots will cry foul and make GC process even harder.

    Right now, sit tight and wither the financial storm. The best action is to unlink I-485 adjudication to priority date. So, I-485 is approved and status changed to "Approved, awaiting VISA number".

    They should create a list where approved I-485s with VISA number pending will be placed in a queue based on original PD. They should get automatic VISA number as soon as one is available in that order. Then the system automatically orders a GC. This should be automated so that another IO shouldn't mess with it.

    They can also link this database with FBI or crime database so that if anyone is convicted, it will automatically generate a flag and USCIS can decide what to do with that approved 485. So, this will keep bad guys out if they commit any crimes while 485 is awaiting VISA number.

    IV core, think about this.



    more...


    house DAKOTA FANNING! dakota fanning push hot. ♥Dakota Fanning - She can get
  • ♥Dakota Fanning - She can get



  • spicy_guy
    08-11 11:56 AM
    Guys,

    All EB3 Is are coming forward. Thats a good thing.

    But do we have:
    - A leader to lead this effort
    - Agenda to follow
    - Specific Goals
    - Action Items
    - Immediate Goals

    Without these we are not going anywhere. But just wasting our time on top of our already surmounting frustration.





    tattoo Dakota Fanning - cast in New dakota fanning push hot. Dakota Fanning goes royal in
  • Dakota Fanning goes royal in



  • alex99
    10-25 11:19 AM
    Please participate in EB3 Poll



    more...


    pictures Dakota Fanning was born with dakota fanning push hot. Dakota Fanning Kristen Stewart
  • Dakota Fanning Kristen Stewart



  • 3d Nirvana
    02-27 09:39 PM
    nice BLUE! That was exactly the site I was looking for. :)





    dresses Dakota Fanning has signed dakota fanning push hot. Mod The Sims - dakota fanning
  • Mod The Sims - dakota fanning



  • franklin
    06-08 02:48 AM
    FBI security clearance has been a blackhole with many people stuck in it without having a hope of relief in sight.Everyone might have tried the senetors, congressman, snail-mails and Faxes but of no use.
    How about the following new methods:
    1. Send a collective petition, A common letter requesting FBI, president with the details of all those stuck in the process.
    2. A letter to the news channels.
    3. Web fax to the senators/congressman

    Please share your ideas.

    I would actually also suggest requesting a meeting with both senators and congressperson in your area, rather than sending a webfax.



    more...


    makeup Dakota Fanning established dakota fanning push hot. DAKOTA FANNING!
  • DAKOTA FANNING!



  • hopefulgc
    10-15 04:35 PM
    ^^
    This is exactly what we need. Let us get going on this people.
    Nixstor, a suggestion ... maybe add a poll to this so we can track how many have sent this letter.



    IV has been working with officials in DHS (not USCIS) to find the exact number of AOS applications pending sorted by priority date, per country, per category.

    Even though the need for requested information is clear and DHS officials agreed to push USCIS for such information, they clearly told IV to demonstrate the need by filing FOIA requests. A request from IV is already pending, but the more the number of requests, the more prioritized this request will become. There are approximately 65,000 FOIA requests pending in Track2 of USCIS queue.

    FOIA can be filed with USCIS either by using G-639 or by writing a simple letter. Our request will not fit the G-639 format and a simple notarized letter will do. I am attaching a sample document that members can download from Megaupload (http://www.megaupload.com/?d=ERDT5F3P) or Google docs (http://docs.google.com/View?docid=ddkc5z3x_1f5nvp5gm) and replace the fictitious John Doe information with theirs and mail out the letter to the address in the letter.

    If you are really information hungry, this is your chance to get it.

    (1) Download attachment

    (2) Replace John Doe information with yours & print it

    (3) Notarize it and mail it





    girlfriend Dakota Fanning goes royal in dakota fanning push hot. cherie currie dakota fanning.
  • cherie currie dakota fanning.



  • amitjoey
    02-14 02:11 PM
    Using your analogy, the more Indians, Chinese, Mexicans, Filipinos stand in the checkout, the lesser the chance for ROW people to get through the checkout. So, how can you say the waiting time will be EQUAL for everyone?

    Everybody stands in one single queue......one line not five lines......one line my friend, irrespective of your nationality. so if you wait 2 years, or 2 hours..I wait the same. Unlike NOW, where some people wait 5-8 years and others 1-2 years.





    hairstyles Dakota Fanning at the 2008 dakota fanning push hot. Dakota Fanning amp; Michael Sheen
  • Dakota Fanning amp; Michael Sheen



  • desi3933
    03-11 11:12 AM
    See here this guy is also saying the same thing what my lawyer has predicted.
    http://immigration-information.com/forums/showthread.php?p=28881#post28881

    This is what Ron has said (link provided by you)
    --------
    I am just speculating, but it appears that the CIS has decided to concentrate on EB3 AOS cases and is trying to use up as much of the quota as possible there. At the same time, the State Department is slowly advancing the China/India EB2 cutoff dates to try to use up numbers there.
    -------------

    Two things -
    2. EB3 are being approved so use to use all available quota for EB3
    2. How slowly advancing for eb2 means current to you?





    neoneo
    09-26 09:31 PM
    ---
    Hi,

    Thanks for your feedback:
    "I don't think CNN is to be faulted that much coz IV itself has lost its focus towards Employment Based Green Cards."

    Your comment doesn't make sense to me. Please explain.

    The point to be made is simple. Over last few months IV members, as an organization, with all it's diverse members and even more diverse immigration problems, in general have moved towards having an opinion and pushing an agenda in a direction which may affect H1-B, F1 visas and not directly EB Green cards.

    It would be more prudent if the message sent across is simple-- rather than use the term generic term of legal immigrants - it should focus towards EB-Green cards, coz very few (other than the stuck )understand that H1-B is non-immigrant visa and try to club the whole GC + H1B issue together.

    From CNN's point of view (and the whole world) the Legal immigrants are GC, H1, F1, B1, L1, etc .. the onus is on IV to clear that IV stands for EB based GCs. period. Use the term "Immigrant" wisely and sparsely.





    immique
    07-13 02:03 AM
    the date is July 8th 2008 and NOT 2007 as you mentioned. July 8th 2008 is when USCIS submitted the list to the State Department regarding the demand for visa numbers. please do not confuse this with July visa bulletin developments of last year.

    This part is self-explanatory. It seems that USCIS made a list of all the applicants to Jul 08, 2007 by setting PD to Jun 01, 2006.

    Documentarily Qualified might possibly imply:
    .. Medically OK
    .. FP and Name Check OK
    .. Everything in application is consistent (e.g. DOB, Name, Kids, Spouse)
    .. Requires No RFE
    .. Requires no interview
    .. Just requires GC (Visa) Number

    My 2 cents input



    Source URL: http://lawoutsider.blogspot.com/2011/06/dakota-fanning-push-hot.html
    Visit Fashion and tattoos for Daily Updated Hairstyles Collection

0 comments:

Post a Comment

Blog Archive